Hello. My name is Sarah, and I believe in the Second Amendment. I am also a liberal, so I believe in gun control. There, now that I’ve said it, both sides can skewer me, but perhaps they’ll learn to work together and compromise in the process.
Digressions…
Let me back up for a moment. I believe in the Second Amendment for a variety of reasons. I believe I have the right to bear arms (I like a good sleeveless tee), bear knives, bear cricket bats (in the event throwing albums at the zombies doesn’t work) bear big sticks, and bear guns. I believe that many American families rely on hunting in the various rifle seasons for a stable and reasonably-priced source of protein. I believe I find venison and pheasant and duck to be especially tasty. I believe in the right for law-abiding citizens to purchase, register, and possess firearms—hopefully with a healthy dose of safety training. I believe in the right for individuals to protect their homes with a gun, if they choose, and otherwise, if they do not choose a gun (I prefer aluminum softball bats, myself). I believe that those who enjoy shooting as a competitive sport and have gone through lawful means to procure said tools for their sport have the right to own weapons.
Honestly, I believe our Founding Fathers were pretty darn smart, could think ahead a bit, and would still intend for our nation to have this right—if we choose to (you can always choose to not have a gun in your house—and I think that’s totally fine, too. Your house? Your rules).
Now, let me tell you what I DON’T believe in.
I don’t believe in the right for a nation’s citizenry to own implements of war. I don’t believe the Second Amendment includes assault weapons, extended clips, hollow points, grenades, tanks, anti-aircraft artillery, missile launchers, or nuclear bombs because they are implements of war. You get the idea, right? I don’t believe that you should be allowed to own an implement of war without at least six weeks of basic training and an active military ID. I find the idea that someone can conceal and carry in my state with an eight hour class to be deplorable. I will not send my children to public school in my state if Missouri passes the proposed bill to allow armed teachers and administrators in our public schools. I don’t believe in anyone being armed inside a school, church, or government building.
I do believe in more access to mental health care (let’s get to people before they want to shoot and kill others, why don’t we?) but I do not believe in a database of those who’ve been classified as ‘mentally ill’. For Pete’s sake, should my post-partum depression bar me from owning a gun? Where do we draw the line? Who gets to decide?
I do believe in training our teachers and administrators to better respond to an active threat. Hiding in the closet, bathroom, or corner of the room is about the worst option you can choose. I believe in better background checks and longer wait times (I’d be fine waiting a week or two, wouldn’t you?) and better police training and mandatory gun safety education… and I don’t believe in gun shows at all.
I believe in strict gun control, but I do not believe in an outright ban of guns. I know, I know, it’s a conundrum for many of those who I would consider to be on the far ends of the continuum.
I also believe that most people in this country think the NRA and Piers Morgan are all jerkfaces… and perhaps this will be the point that brings us all together and starts the ball rolling.
Again with the digressions…
Let me tell you, however, what I do believe in over all other things: I believe that most Americans want to discuss gun ownerships and laws. I believe that most Americans find themselves in the middle of the continuum where on the left there is the stripping of all weapons, and on the right there’s the NRA of present day. I believe most Americans are moderates. I believe most Americans want and CAN reach a compromise on the gun control issue. I believe we can find common ground.
Yet, I’m afraid Congress and the White House will not be able to do the same, especially if we sit back, quiet, and do not tell them (in small words) that discussion, compromise, and common ground is exactly what we want and what we will demand from them.
Tell me: What do you believe and not believe in?











Kath
01/16/2013
I believe in the 2nd Amendment and I too am a liberal. The two are not mutually exclusive. I also believe there should be limitation on what we are allowed to purchase when that object can shoot enough bullets to take large numbers of lives in just a minute or two.
If I go into a drugstore for the purpose of buying Claritin or any other medicine which has ingredients used to create meth, I must show a picture ID and I am restricted to buying a limited amount in a thirty day period. Yet I can buy enough guns and bullets in a month to take out an entire city.
It makes no sense.
I agree most American want a meaningful dialogue concerning gun control. And at least it seems the President is about to start the discussion whether the NRA likes it or not.
Sarah
01/16/2013
I agree, and I’m glad to see that other like-minded individuals such as yourself are out there. The talking heads tell us that it’s either this or that, black or white. I don’t think that can ever be the case– no matter the issue.
The one thing that bothers me about the president’s proposal is that he used so many executive orders. Not that the orders themselves bother me. I don’t believe they’ve all been released in the media quite yet, but what I’ve seen makes sense. What bothers me is the use of orders opens the door for the far NRA-side of the continuum to come out and say that he’s trying to ban all guns with no Congressional process. Which, while not completely true, is an argument that carries some perception of strength with it right now.
Lance
01/16/2013
i like kath’s clarintin analogy
While driving a car may not be in the bill of rights, we accept all regulations and laws and hoops to jump through to drive one – insurance, testing, tickets, etc. There’s no driver’s lobby.
so why not accept the hoops to jump for guns?
I just don;t think the second amendment was meant, by the founding fathers, for citizens to arm themselves to the hilt to kill deer and people.
Sarah
01/16/2013
I agree- the right of the citizenry to ‘keep and bear arms’ is not infringed upon when we state that you must pass a background check and wait 10 days to receive your arms. You’re still going to get them. You can still keep them. No one is going to take them away from you. We’re just going to regulate the process.
deana
01/16/2013
I agree with all of the above. Great post.
Sarah
01/16/2013
Thank you!
Damon Rallis
01/16/2013
Excellent post Sarah… all of the above… I ran my mouth over on Lance’s piece, so I won’t bore you here.
Sarah
01/16/2013
Not fair! There’s tiny part of me that want’s to throw a temper tantrum about Lance getting more comments than me… Of course, I’ve commented about a half a dozen times over there, I think, so I’m really not doing myself any favors, am I?
Being quiet now!
Lance
01/16/2013
meh…the hate mail i’m getting and the negative Book o Face comments say your “jealousy is misplaced madame.
Your ideas are what motivated this and me. Thank you. I almost canceled my portion. I’m glad you read it first.
thank you
Sarah
01/16/2013
Thank you, Lance, for playing along! No horrific comments on the Book of Face for me, but my FB friends are oddly quiet. I don’t know that there are many who stand in the middle, like me.